Skip to main content

stakeholder value

Willy the CEO slammed down his mobile after another ear bashing from his biggest investor. He took a breath, dialled the newly appointed CTO and explained the situation. “We’re in the last chance saloon, RJ. The board have given us six months to fix what we’re delivering from Engineering. We need to prove our value and fast!” Willy sighed and continued, “They’re pushing me to consider outsourcing everything.”

Sitting in his office, RJ took a deep breath and thought about his team’s performance, “My teams are solid. We deliver on time and we deliver high quality, well-tested code but still the stakeholders complain about the product. What’s going wrong?” He reached for the phone and called Colin, the coach.

Sitting in RJ’s office some days later, Colin explained to RJ about stakeholder value, “Stakeholders sponsor a product because they believe it will give them benefit or value, if you like. Your teams need to focus on delivering this value to the stakeholders.” “I thought we were doing that,” said RJ sounding confused. “You’re focussed on building things for end-users; you need to understand stakeholders are customers, too” said Colin.

He stood and moved to the whiteboard. He wrote one line,

“How Do You Measure Stakeholder Value?”

RJ looked blankly at him, “What do you mean?”

“Another way of putting it is; how do we know we’re building the right thing?” replied Colin. “But we place a very high emphasis on quality; we have thousands of tests to prove we’re building the right thing!” said RJ.

Colin took a deep breath, “What you have are thousands of engineering tests. Engineers created those tests for their benefit and they are extremely valuable but they can only tell you if you’ve built the thing right, they can’t tell you if you’ve built the right thing.” He paused while RJ thought about this. “Without stakeholder input you can never know if you’ve built the right thing, you’re just stabbing in the dark.”

“So we need to introduce stakeholder tests?” asked RJ. “That’s only part of it,” continued Colin. “We also need to make sure the thing we’re building right is the most valuable thing we can build. It’s no good building a perfect thing that nobody wants,” he said with a grin.

RJ arranged for Colin to meet with Lana, the Business Analyst and some key stakeholders at their own offices. With everybody seated round a table, Colin took a handful of features and got the group to rate them on scale of 1 to 5. After some bickering amongst the group, five features scored as highly valuable. Of these, the group picked ‘Clicks-to-Cash’ as their most valuable feature.

Colin then started to ask questions about the value of the feature. “According to our site analytics, about 30% of customers with more than three items in the basket drop out before payment.” said the Head of Marketing, “the checkout process has far too many clicks and is losing us sales. I can get you actual figures if you like.”

“Thanks, I’d appreciate that. We can judge the success of ‘Clicks-to-Cash’ simply by recording what percentage of customers with more than three items in the basket drop out before payment after the fix compared to the percentage before the fix.” Suggested Colin.

The meeting continued, dealing with every item on the feature list. Later, Colin discussed the outcome with RJ, “Now we know what the most valuable things to work on are. We’ve also agreed with the stakeholders what they will look like – acceptance criteria, if you will. Lastly, we’ve agreed how to measure the success of the features. All of these have to be known and agreed if we’re to deliver stakeholder value”

After re-scheduling the work, RJ’s teams continued delivering high-quality code but this time, he knew they were also delivering high-value features. If they continued with this approach, the board would soon change their minds about outsourcing them.

“It seems so obvious now,” said RJ to Colin. “I can see that before we were building high quality features we thought might be wanted and might be valuable. We didn’t ask the stakeholder’s opinion because they were too busy to come to us but now I realise we have to go to them.

Popular posts from this blog

The Limitations of Reward in Organisational Development

The ongoing inquiry into the Post Office Scandal[1] has recently brought to light disturbing evidence. It appears that Post Office investigators were incentivised with monetary bonuses for successful prosecutions and the confiscation of funds from sub-postmasters and sub-postmistresses affected by the faulty Horizon software[2].  As discussed in Dan Pink's book on motivation, "Drive[3]," the repercussions of offering extrinsic rewards without adequate safeguards can be severe. People might exploit the system, ignoring long-term consequences for the sake of immediate gains. The effectiveness of rewards, such as bonuses and salary increases, in motivating and disciplining individuals has been a subject of ongoing debate. While some argue that extrinsic incentives can drive desired behaviors and outcomes, there is a growing body of evidence suggesting otherwise. Let's explore the limitations of relying on rewards in these contexts, emphasising the significance of intrins

Embracing AI - Augmented Intelligence

There is no denying that artificial intelligence (AI) has made significant strides over recent years, becoming more advanced and capable than ever before. With this progress, many have begun to wonder whether AI poses a threat to humanity, particularly our jobs, privacy, security, and overall well-being.  Some may argue that the rapid advancement of AI could lead to a dystopian world where machines rule supreme and humans become obsolete. However, it is important to remember that at its core, AI exists to serve us, not replace us. Instead of viewing AI as competition for human intelligence, we should consider it as an augmentation of our abilities.  This idea of 'Augmented Intelligence,' instead of Artificial Intelligence, highlights how powerful technology can enhance rather than impede human potential. Augmented Intelligence recognizes that humans and machines each possess their unique strengths, making them better together than apart. Humans excel in creativity, intuition, a

Embracing the Promise of AI: Overcoming Fears and Musk's Paradox

In the face of groundbreaking technologies like AI, initial fears and uncertainties are not uncommon. However, history has shown that society often transitions from apprehension to wholehearted acceptance as the true potential of a technology unfolds.  When motor vehicles emerged in the late 19th century, society grappled with fear and uncertainty. Laws mandating a person carrying a red flag to precede each vehicle reflected public anxiety and attempts to mitigate potential accidents.  Similarly, society's current apprehension towards AI stems from fear of the unknown and its potential disruptive consequences. However, history shows that initial fears are often unfounded and subside with increased familiarity and understanding of new technologies. AI's capability to process vast amounts of data and identify complex patterns presents unprecedented opportunities for decision-making and efficiency. Organizations can unlock insights, make data-driven decisions, and optimize process